Acts 17:32

32 When they heard about the resurrection of the dead, some of them sneered, but others said, “We want to hear you again on this subject.”

Acts 17:32 in Other Translations

32 And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter.

32 Now when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked. But others said, "We will hear you again about this."

32 When they heard Paul speak about the resurrection of the dead, some laughed in contempt, but others said, “We want to hear more about this later.”

32 At the phrase "raising him from the dead," the listeners split: Some laughed at him and walked off making jokes; others said, "Let's do this again. We want to hear more."

32 Now when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked; but others said, We will hear thee concerning this yet again.

32 When the people of the court heard that a person had come back to life, some began joking about it, while others said, "We'll hear you talk about this some other time."

32 When they heard about resurrection of the dead, some began to ridicule him. But others said, "We will hear you about this again."

32 When they heard Paul talk about the dead rising, some of them made fun of it. But others said, "We want to hear you speak about this again."

Acts 17:32 Meaning and Commentary

Acts 17:32

When they heard of the resurrection of the dead
Of a certain man that the apostle said God had raised from the dead, though they knew not who he was:

some mocked;
at him, and at the doctrine he preached: these very likely were of the Epicurean sect, who disbelieved a future state; though, as Tertullian observes ^F2, the doctrine of the resurrection was denied by every sect of the philosophers: it is a doctrine of pure revelation, and what the light of nature never taught men, and by which men being only guided, have declared against, and have treated it with the utmost ridicule and contempt. Pliny ^F3 reckons it, among childish fancies, and calls it vanity, and downright madness to believe it; as does also Caecilius in Minutius Felix ^F4, and who even calls it a lie, and places it among old wives' fables; and Celsus in Origen ^F5 represents it as exceeding detestable, abominable, and impossible.

And others said, we will hear thee again of this matter;
some think these were of the Stoic sect, who held a future state, and that the soul would live after the body, and had some notions which looked inclining to this doctrine: however, these thought there might be something in what the apostle said; they could not receive it readily, and yet could not deny it; they were willing to take time to consider of it; and were desirous of hearing him again upon that subject; in which they might be very open and upright; and this might not be a mere excuse to shift off any further hearing at that time, like that of Felix, in ( Acts 24:1-25:27 ) .

---

FOOTNOTES:

F2 De praescript. Heret. c. 7. p. 232.
F3 Nat. Hist. l. 7. c. 55.
F4 Octav. p. 10.
F5 Contra Cals. l. 5. p. 240.

Acts 17:32 In-Context

30 In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent.

31 For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising him from the dead.”

32 When they heard about the resurrection of the dead, some of them sneered, but others said, “We want to hear you again on this subject.”

33 At that, Paul left the Council.

34 Some of the people became followers of Paul and believed. Among them was Dionysius, a member of the Areopagus, also a woman named Damaris, and a number of others.

Cross References

• 1. ver 18,31